Development Of A Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question Assessment Instrument To Measure Students Science Process Skills On Acid-Base Material
Abstract
This development research aims to: 1) develop a two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument that is able to measure the science process skills of high school students, 2) determine the feasibility of a two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument to measure high school students' science process skills, 3) determine the response teachers regarding the two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument applied in schools. This research uses the Borg and Gall procedure which has been reduced to 9 stages, namely: 1) preliminary stage, 2) planning stage, 3) initial product design development stage, 4) initial trial stage, 5) initial product revision stage, 6) field trial stage, 7) field trial product revision stage, 8) operational trial stage, 9) final product revision stage. The research was conducted at SMA N 1 Bengkulu and SMA N 2 Bengkulu in the 2014/2015 academic year. Data collection techniques were carried out through questionnaires, observation, and tests. The types of data obtained are qualitative and quantitative data. The effectiveness of the assessment instrument product was carried out by means of a mean difference test using a sample of two classes for each school. This test is to compare the scores of students in the experimental class using the two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument and the control class using the multiple choice question assessment instrument. The results showed that: 1) a two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument that was able to measure the science process skills of high school students was successfully developed through 9 stages of Borg and Gall. 2) The feasibility of the TTMCQ assessment instrument product is guaranteed through the content validity which is considered good by material experts, the construct validity is considered good by the assessment instrument expert, the validity of the items is good, the reliability is high, has a difficulty level with the proportion of 53% easy, 42% moderate, and 5% difficult, has sufficient distinguishing power with minimal interpretation, and has a good level of practicality, which means it is suitable for use in learning. 3) Teacher responses include that the teacher has never used questions in the form of two-tier multiple choice questions, the question form is good and neat, teachers are willing to reuse multilevel multiple choice questions on the grounds that this form of questions challenges students to improve science process skills.
References
Akinbobola, A. O. dan Afolabi, F. 2010. Analysis of Science Process Skills in West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Physics Practical Examinations in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 5 (4): 234-240. ISSN 1818-6785
Ango, M.L. 2002. Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context. International Journal of Educology 1 (16) : 11-30.
Agusyana, Y. 2011. Olah Data Skripsi dan Penelitian SPSS 18. Jakarta: Gramedia Aydin, A. 2013. Representation of Science Process Skills In The Chemistry Curricula for Grades 10, 11, and 12/ Turkey. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2013, 1(5) : 51-63.
Arikunto, S. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara. Ariyati, E. 2009. Keterampilan Proses Sains. Makalah Tidak Dipublikasikan. Program Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Konsentrasi Pendidikan Biologi-SL. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Borg, W.R dan Gall, M.D. 1983. Educational Research An Introduction (4th Ed). White Plains : Logman Inc.
Borg, W.R., Gall, M.D., dan Gall, J.P. 2007. Educational Research An Introduction (8th Ed). White Plains : Logman Inc.
Budiyono. 2009. Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press. Chabalengula, V.M., Mumba, F. dan Mbewe, S. 2012. How Pre-Service Teachers Understand and Perform Science Process Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science & Technology Education, 2012, 8(3), 167-176. Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA.
Cullinane, A. dan Liston, M. 2011. Two Tier Multiple Choice Question : An Alternative Method of Formative Assessment for First Year Undergraduate biology Students. Limerick : National Center for Excellence In Mathematics and Education Sciences Teaching and Learning.
Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Penulisan BcuotmirmSoitatlo. Juaskearrta : Depdiknas.
Dewantari, A. 2015. Laporan Pengolahan Hasil Angket SNP SMAN 1 Surakarta dan SMAN 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Laporan Tidak Dipublikasikan. Pascasarjana FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Halaydina, T.M dan Downing, S.M. 1989. A Taxonomy of Multiple Choice Item Writing Rules. Applied Measurements In Education, 2(1), 37-50.
Harlen, W. 1992. The Teaching of Science: Studies in Primary Education. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Kartimi. 2012. Pengembangan Alat Ukur Berpikir Kritis pada Konsep Termokimia untuk Siswa SMA Peringkat Atas dan Menengah. Jurnal JPII 1 (1) (2012) 21-26.
Kilic, D. dan Saglam, N. 2009. Development of Two Tier Diagnostic Test to Determine Students Understanding of Concepts In Genetics. Egitim Arasmalari-Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 36, 227-244.
Kutluay, Y. 2005. Diagnosis of Eleventh Grade Student Misconceptions About Geometric Optic By A Three-Tier Test. Thesis. The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University.
Kwen, B.H. dan Cheng, A.K. 2005. Using Two Tier Reflective Multiple Choice Questions to Cater to Creative Thinking. AARE 2005 International Education Research Conference.
Nofiana, M. 2013. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Permendiknas No. 20 Tahun 2007. Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas. Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006. Standar Isi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
Permendiknas No. 23 Tahun 2006. Standar Kompetensi Lulusan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
Purwanto, N. 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ramirez, R.P.B. dan Ganaden, M.S. 2008. Creative Activities and Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Education Quarterly, Vol 66 (1), 22-23.
Rusfidra. 2006. Penilaian Proses Belajar Mengajar IPA Di Kelas Melalui Pedagogi. Tersedia di: http://rayapkabel.wordpress.com/ diakses pada 25 April 2014.
Rustaman, N.Y., dkk. 2012. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Common Textbook JICA IMSTEP. Bandung: FPMTP A UPI.
Sagala, S. 2011. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran untuk Membantu Memecahkan Masalah Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Sampson, V. 2006. Two-Tier Assessment. Teacher Toolkit. Arizona : College of Education At Arizona State University In Tempe.
Stiggins, R.J. 1994. Student Centered Classrom Assesment. USA: Macmillanr College Publishing Company.
Subali, B. 2009. Pengembangan Tes Pengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen Biologi SMA. Makalah disajikan pada Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, Lingkungan dan Pembelajarannya. Jurdik Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 4 Juli 2009.
Sudjana, N. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sukiman. 2012. Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta : Insan Madani. Suparlan. 2006. Guru Sebagai Profesi. Yogyakarta: Hikayat Publishing.
Supranata, S. 2004. Panduan Penulisan Tes Tertulis Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Susilo, H. 2013. Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains Materi Sistem Pencernaan Kelas XI SMA N 1 Pemalang. Skripsi. Tersedia di lib.unnes.ac.id/18954/1/4401408098.pdf diakses pada 2 Februari 2015.
Treagust, D.F. 2006. Development and Use of Diagnostic Test to Evaluate Students Misconception In Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 2 pp 159-169.
Tuysuz, C. 2009. Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students Understanding In Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay Academic Journals Vol 4 (6) pp. 626-631, June 2009. ISSN 1992-2248.
Vichitvejpaisal, P., et al. 2011. Developing a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Arterial Blood Gates Learning by Students with Different Background Knowledge In Anesthesiology. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education Vol 5 No 2, 2011.
Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Construction of the assessment concept to measure students' high order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237-251.
Wartono. 2003. Strategi Belajar MengacjaormFmiistiktao.uMsearlang: JICA.
Widodo, W. 2013. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Sains dan Keterkaitannya dengan Ide-Ide Penelitian Pendidikan Sains Menuju Indonesia Maju. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains UNS.
Yuliati, L. 2008. Model-Model Pembelajaran Fisika. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang.
Copyright (c) 2023 ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal ini diterbitkan oleh Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu dan Disebarluaskan dengan perijinan dibawah Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
