Digital Public Financial Management and Good Governance: The Mediating Role of Transparency and Accountability in Local Government Performance
Abstract
This study examines the explanatory relationships among Digital Public Financial Management (DPFM), transparency, accountability, and local government performance, with transparency and accountability modeled as parallel mediators. Using a cross-sectional quantitative design, data were obtained from 312 local government officials involved in financial management across multiple local government institutions and analyzed with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). DPFM was positively associated with transparency (β = 0.756, p < .001), accountability (β = 0.783, p < .001), and local government performance (β = 0.241, p = .001). Transparency (β = 0.284, p < .001) and accountability (β = 0.391, p < .001) were also positively associated with performance. The specific indirect effects through transparency (β = 0.215, p < .001) and accountability (β = 0.306, p < .001) were significant, supporting parallel mediation. Because the design is cross-sectional and based on self-reported survey data, the findings are interpreted as explanatory associations rather than causal effects. The study contributes an integrated model showing how digital financial management is associated with local government performance through two governance mechanisms, while good governance is retained as the broader theoretical framing rather than a separately estimated construct.
References
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
Agostino, D., Bracci, E., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Accounting and accountability for the digital transformation of public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12314
Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301
Ariani, D. I., & Setyaningrum, D. (2023). E-procurement and corruption prevention in Indonesia’s local governments. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 18(3–4), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2023.136316
Atobishi, T., Abu Bakir, S. M., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of organizational agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020037
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Busuioc, M. (2021). Accountable artificial intelligence: Holding algorithms to account. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13293
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685
Damanik, F. H. S., & Remtula, J. N. (2026). Metacognitive readiness in digital learning and its role in lifelong learning pathways. Digital Learning, Social Science, and Life-course Studies, 2(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.70211/disolife.v1i2.349
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Ferry, L., Midgley, H., Murphie, A., & Sandford, M. (2023). Auditing governable space—A study of place-based accountability in England. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(4), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12321
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Feeney, M. K. (2017). Developing and testing an integrative framework for open government adoption in local governments. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12689
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Huang, H., Liao, C. Z.-P., Liao, H.-C., & Chen, D.-Y. (2020). Resisting by workarounds: Unraveling the barriers of implementing open government data policy. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), Article 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101495
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Li, M., & Yang, J. (2024). Can digital economy mitigate vertical fiscal imbalances in Chinese local government? The role of fiscal transparency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, Article 103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103713
Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, Article 119751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), Article 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Michener, G., & Nichter, S. (2022). Local compliance with national transparency legislation. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), Article 101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101659
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Nani, D. A., & Ali, S. (2020). Determinants of effective e-procurement system: Empirical evidence from Indonesian local governments. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 7(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i1.15671
Octavio, M. F. R., & Urumsah, D. (2024). Exploring factors influencing digital transparency in local governments: Practices in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 11(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v11i2.39361
OECD. (2024). 2023 OECD Digital Government Index: Results and key findings (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 44). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1a89ed5e-en
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public value creation in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421
Pizzi, S., Venturelli, A., Variale, M., & Macario, G. P. (2021). Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 67, Article 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Pribadi, U., Iqbal, M., Ibrahim, M. A., Juhari, & Ahdarrijal, Y. (2024). Nexus of public organization, transparency, and accountability in Indonesia’s digital governance. Journal of Public Affairs, 24(3), Article e2940. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2940
Rivero del Paso, L., Pattanayak, S., Uña, G., & Tourpe, H. (2023). Digital solutions guidelines for public financial management (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2023/007). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400251566.005
Setyawan, W., & Gamayuni, R. R. (2020). The quality of financial reporting and internal control system before and after the implementation of e-budgeting in Indonesia local government. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 14(3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2020/v14i330194
Shenkoya, T. (2023). Can digital transformation improve transparency and accountability of public governance in Nigeria? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2022-0115
Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., Fahlevi, H., & Ardito, L. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1735690. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690
Sulistiyo, H., Martua, A., Sayuti, S., Mulyana, M., & Ginting, I. T. (2023). Government performance pada kebijakan transformasi digital: Bagaimana transformation capability mempengaruhinya? (Studi empiris di Provinsi Maluku Utara). Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan, 6(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.33701/jkp.v6i2.3679
Tahir, M. I., Martini, A., Gunawan, A. A. N., Makbul, Y., Yossa, N., Wiryanto, W., Fahrudin, M., & Ilya, R. (2025). Can digital transformation improve the transparency and accountability of Indonesian public governance? International Journal of Data and Network Science, 9(3), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.7.009
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, Article 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Virnandes, S. R., Shen, J., & Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2024). Building public trust through digital government transformation: A qualitative study of Indonesian civil service agency. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.114
Wahyuni, H. I., Fitrah, A. A., Eprilianto, D. F., & Mardalena, I. (2024). Technology, transparency, and collaboration/integration: Analysis of digital government problems from public communication perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Information Polity, 29(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211545
Yang, C., Gu, M., & Albitar, K. (2024). Government in the digital age: Exploring the impact of digital transformation on governmental efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, Article 123722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123722
Zhu, B., Zhong, R., & Wei, C. (2024). Measuring digital government service performance: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 83, Article 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102105
Žuffová, M. (2020). Do FOI laws and open government data deliver as anti-corruption policies? Evidence from a cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), Article 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101480
Copyright (c) 2025 M Nawawi, Siti Zulaika, Nuphanudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
1.png)
_(3).png){kind=small}
