Strategic Public Relations Management in Building the Brand Image of Islamic Schools in a Muslim-Minority Context: A Multiple Case Study
Abstract
This study investigates how strategic public relations (PR) management contributes to the construction of brand image and institutional legitimacy in Islamic schools operating within a Muslim-minority context in Southern Thailand. Using an interpretivist qualitative multiple-case design, the study examined Ma’had Al-Bi’that Ad-Diniah in Yala and Madrasah Darussalam in Narathiwat. Data were generated from seven purposively selected informants two principals, three teachers, and two students through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, and were analyzed through iterative coding, within-case thematic analysis, and cross-case comparison. The findings show that positive brand image was constructed less through promotional intensity than through community engagement, network-based collaboration, value-driven communication, leadership visibility, stakeholder trust, and educational differentiation. In the minority setting, socio-political sensitivity, educational competition, and multicultural communication shaped how Islamic identity was communicated and evaluated. Across the cases, stakeholders interpreted school image through the perceived consistency between institutional messages and everyday educational, ethical, and social practices. The study therefore conceptualizes brand image as a relational and legitimacy-based outcome produced through accumulated stakeholder experience rather than communication exposure alone. Practically, Islamic schools in plural environments should prioritize sustained stakeholder relationships, transparent communication, credible educational quality, and alignment between religious identity and observable organizational practice; these findings also provide a context-sensitive basis for strengthening strategic PR in faith-based education.
References
Arphattananon, T. (2018). Multicultural education in Thailand. Intercultural Education, 29(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2018.1430020
Assalihee, M., & Boonsuk, Y. (2023). Teaching management strategies on 21st century Islamic education for southernmost Thai private Islamic schools. Anatolian Journal of Education, 8(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.812a
Assalihee, M., Bakoh, N., Boonsuk, Y., & Songmuang, J. (2024). Transforming Islamic education through Lesson Study (LS): A classroom-based approach to professional development in Southern Thailand. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091029
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
Brauckmann, S., Pashiardis, P., & Ärlestig, H. (2023). Bringing context and educational leadership together: Fostering the professional development of school principals. Professional Development in Education, 49(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1747105
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Mampaey, J. L. J. (2021). Brand communication of higher education institutions: A call for multichannel communication analysis in higher education branding research. Higher Education Policy, 34(4), 928–948. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00178-x
Bruning, S. D., & Ledingham, J. A. (1999). Relationships between organizations and publics: Development of a multi-dimensional organization-public relationship scale. Public Relations Review, 25(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80160-X
Chapleo, C. (2015). Brands in higher education: Challenges and potential strategies. International Studies of Management & Organization, 45(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1006014
Chapleo, C., & Clark, P. (2016). Branding a tertiary institution by committee: An exploration of internal brand analysis and management processes. Journal of Brand Management, 23(6), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-016-0009-1
Cheng, Y. (2018). Looking back, moving forward: A review and reflection of the organization-public relationship (OPR) research. Public Relations Review, 44(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.003
Clark, P., Chapleo, C., & Suomi, K. (2020). Branding higher education: An exploration of the role of internal branding on middle management in a university rebrand. Tertiary Education and Management, 26, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09054-9
Crilly, D., Hansen, M. T., & Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms' sustainability claims and stakeholders' interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0171
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Dean, D., Arroyo-Gamez, R. E., Punjaisri, K., & Pich, C. (2016). Internal brand co-creation: The experiential brand meaning cycle in higher education. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3041–3048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.019
Dhanesh, G. S. (2017). Putting engagement in its PRoper place: State of the field, definition and model of engagement in public relations. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.001
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_5
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610669176
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kang, M., & Park, Y. E. (2017). Exploring trust and distrust as conceptually and empirically distinct constructs: Association with symmetrical communication and public engagement across four pairings of trust and distrust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29(2–3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2017.1337579
Ki, E.-J., & Hon, L. C. (2009a). A measure of relationship cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802520488
Ki, E.-J., & Hon, L. C. (2009b). Causal linkages between relationship cultivation strategies and relationship quality outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(4), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180903218630
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Ledingham, J. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_4
Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9
Liow, J. C. (2010). Religious education and reformist Islam in Thailand's Southern Border Provinces: The roles of Haji Sulong Abdul Kadir and Ismail Lutfi Japakiya. Journal of Islamic Studies, 21(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etp026
Macnamara, J. (2016a). Organizational listening: Addressing a major gap in public relations theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(3–4), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1228064
Macnamara, J. (2016b). The work and 'architecture of listening': Addressing gaps in organization-public communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1147043
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Men, L. R. (2014). Why leadership matters to internal communication: Linking transformational leadership, symmetrical communication, and employee outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908719
Men, L. R., & Stacks, D. W. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on strategic internal communication and employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908720
Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2015). Infusing social media with humanity: Corporate character, public engagement, and relational outcomes. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.02.005
Men, L. R., Tsai, W.-H. S., Chen, Z. F., & Ji, Y. G. (2018). Social presence and digital dialogic communication: Engagement lessons from top social CEOs. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498341
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581
Pinar, M., Trapp, P., Girard, T., & Boyt, T. E. (2014). University brand equity: An empirical investigation of its dimensions. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0051
Raihani, R., Karim, P., Asyari, S. M., & Mahnun, N. (2016). Delivering Islamic studies and teaching diversity in Southern Thai Islamic schools. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 54(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2016.541.123-146
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Babin, B. J., & Ivens, B. S. (2016). Brand management in higher education: The university brand personality scale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3077–3086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.023
Squires, A. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.006
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2019). How service quality affects university brand performance, university brand image and behavioural intention: The mediating effects of satisfaction and trust and moderating roles of gender and study mode. Journal of Brand Management, 26(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0131-3
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight 'big-tent' criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H., & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: Is meaning lost in translation? European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y
Wekke, I. S., Siddin, S., & Langputeh, S. (2019). Islamic education in Thailand Pattani Muslim minority: What are the institutional continuity and change? Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.3753
Copyright (c) 2025 Ihsan Laerosa, Fatah Syukur, Nur Khoiri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
1.png)




