Problem-Based Physical Learning with Experimental and Demonstration Methods : Analysis with Scientific Attitude and Student Creativity
Abstract
This study aims to determine the existence of: 1) the effect of Experimentation and Demonstration methods on physics learning achievement, 2) the effect of scientific attitudes on physics learning achievement, 3) the effect of creativity on physical learning achievement, 4) the interaction of learning methods and scientific attitude on physics learning achievement , 5) the interaction of learning methods and creativity on physics learning achievement, 6) the interaction of scientific attitude and creativity on physics learning achievement, 7) the interaction of learning models, scientific attitude, and creativity on physics learning achievement. This research was conducted in December 2009 - May 2010 using the Experimental and Demonstration method. The population of this study were all grade X students of SMA Negeri I Mejayan in the 2009/2010 school year. The sample in this study were four classes taken at random (cluster random sampling). Classes that use experimental methods are selected classes X-1 and X-3 and classes that use selected demonstration methods are classes X-6 and X-7. Variable data collection techniques are used to collect data on cognitive learning achievement, while scientific attitudes and student creativity are obtained using the questionnaire and observation methods. Research hypothesis testing using ANAVA three cell path is not the same as the help of Minitab software 15. The results of research data analysis are 1) there is an influence of the use of Experimentation and Demonstration methods on physics learning achievement, the experimental method is better than the demonstration method (p-value = 0,000 <0.050 ), 2) there is an effect of high and low scientific attitudes of students on physics learning achievement, students who have high scientific attitudes have better achievements than students whose scientific attitude is low (pvalue = 0,000 <0.050), 3) there is an influence of high and low creativity of students towards physics learning achievement, students who have high creativity are better than students with low creativity (p-value 0,000 <0.050), 4) there is no interaction between learning methods and students' scientific attitudes toward physics learning achievement (p value = 0.433> 0.050) 5 ) there is no interaction between learning methods and student creativity on physics learning achievement (p-val ue = 0.251> 0.050), 6) there is no interaction between scientific attitude and student creativity on physics learning achievement (p-value = 0.180> 0.050, 7) there is an interaction between learning methods, scientific attitude, and student creativity on physics learning achievement ( p-value = 0.018 <0.050).
Downloads
References
Asiyah, A., Walid, A., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Pengaruh Rasa Percaya Diri Terhadap Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 9(3), 217-226.
Bobbi De Porter, Mike Hernacki. 2005. The Accelereted Learning Hadbook, Revolusi Pembelajaran dan Anda. Bandung: Kaifa
Cahyono, Wawan Dwi. 2007. Pengaruh Penggunaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis dengan Metode Demonstrasi dan Diskusi terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa (Studi Kasus pada Materi Pokok Pengukuran Kelas VII di SMP Negeri I Nogosari, Kabupaten Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2006/2007). Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana.
Dahar, Ratna Wilis, 2003. Kurikulum 2004 SMA Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Silabus dan Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen, Direktorat Menengah Umum.
Dahar, Ratna Wilis. 1989. Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga. Depdiknas. 1996. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Grinnell, Frederick. “The Scientific Attitude”. www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog - 93k - Cache, diunduh tanggal 10- 2- 2010
Ibnu, Suhadi. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif Volume 2 No. 2, Maret 2007. ”Menyikapi KTSP sebagai Tantangan untuk Menyelenggarakan Pembelajaran yang Lebih Baik”, http://www.jurnal/jpi.wordpress. com/category/ktsp.
Jaka Murapriyanta, 2010. Pembelajaran Fisika Dengan Metode Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Inkuiri Training Ditinjau Dari Sikap Ilmiah dan Keingintahuan ( Studi Kasus Pembelajaran Fisika Pada Topik Listrik Dinamis Kelas X Semester 2 SMA Negeri 3 Pati Tahun Pelajaran 2008/ 2009). Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana.
Justo, Clemente Franco, 2008. “Effects of Teacher Expectations On The Development of Verbal Creativity in Childhood Education, (online)”, Costa Rica; Revista ElectronicaPublicada por el. http://revista.online.inie.ucr.ac.cr. diakses 24 Februari 2009
Kusumah, Wijaya tentang “Model-Model Pembelajaran” http://gurupkn .wordpress.com/category/pembelajaran/model-model/page/3/ diunduh 12 Juli 2009
Lasry, Nathaniel and Christin, Pierre-Osias “Demonstration Learning” diunduh tanggal 10 Pebruari 2010.
Loveless, Avril M. Futurolab, “Creativity, technology and learning – a review of recent literature” School of Education, University of Brighton diunduh 8 Juni 2009.
Maskur, R., Latifah, S., Pricilia, A., Walid, A., & Ravanis, K. (2019). The 7E Learning Cycle Approach to Understand Thermal Phenomena. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 464-474.
Nurhadi. 2004. Kurikulum 2004 Pertanyaan dan Jawaban. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Oliver Nancy, “Writing and Creativity” Written July, 2003 http://www.diaristworkshop.com/ diunduh tanggal 10-2-2010
Sagala, Syaiful. 2005. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sanjaya, Wina. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Cetakan ke-8. Jakarta: Kencana.
Santrock, John W. 2003. Adolescence, Perkembangan Remaja. Jakarta Erlangga Sardiman, A.M. 2006. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Saripati. Ita. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif Volume 2 No. 2, Maret 2007. ”Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) Mendorong Terjadinya Accelerated Learning”, http://www.jurnal/jpi. wordpress. com/ category/ktsp.
Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Sudaryono. 2007. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Masalah dengan Metode Demonstrasi dan Diskusi terhadap Prestasi Siswa Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa (Studi Kasus pada Materi Pokok Kalor Kelas X di SMA Negeri Kebakkramat Kabupaten Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2006/2007). Surakarta : Program Pascasarjana.
Sujarwo dkk., 2005. “Penerapan Pendekatan Inkuiri dalam Pembelajaran Sosiologi dan Kreativitas Siswa”, Teknodika Volume 2 Nomor 01, September 2005
Suparno, Paul. 2007. Metodologi Pembelajaran Fisika Konstruktivisme dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Surya, Yohanes. 2007. Modul Pelatihan Guru Fisika SMA. Tangerang: Surya Institute.
Walid, A., Kusumah, R. G. T., & Mukti, W. A. H. (2019). Thinking Skills Analysis and Attitudes Caring for Body Health in Biological Learning Using the Brain Based Learning Model Accompanied by Roundhouse Diagram Techniques (In the Body Defense System Material).
Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M., & Kusumah, R. G. T. Construction of The Assessment Concept to Measure Students' High Order Thinking Skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237-251.
Widodo, 2010. Pembelajaran Kimia dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Melalui Metode Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi Ditinjau dari Kreativitas dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa ( Studi Eksperimen Pembelajaran Kimia kelas XI SMA Negeri I Kartasura Tahun Pelajaran 2008/ 2009 Standar Kompetensi Sistem Koloid). Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana.
Wik Ed " Problem-Based_Learning” http://wik.ed.uiuc.edu/index.php/ diunduh tanggal 6 February 2009, at 20:53.
Authors who publish with ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.