Seeing the solution: video-assisted direct instruction, learning ‎engagement, and mathematics achievement in vocational ‎education

  • Yulia Cresna Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Abna Hidayati Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Fetri Yeni J. Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Hani Fannisa Universitas Negeri Padang
Keywords: Direct instruction, learning video, student engagement, mathematics achievement, vocational education

Abstract

Low participation has long shadowed mathematics instruction in Indonesian vocational high schools, where teacher-led delivery leaves learners watching rather than thinking. This study tested whether delivering the demonstration phase of the Direct Instruction (DI) model through purpose-built videos raises learning engagement and mathematics achievement, and explored how the two outcomes are related. A quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent pre-test-post-test control-group design was conducted with 58 tenth-grade students at a vocational school in West Sumatra, allocated to video-assisted DI (n = 30) or conventional DI (n = 28). Videos followed a documented design specification, and implementation fidelity, viewing compliance, and instructional time were recorded in both classes. Because a non-significant baseline test is not evidence of equivalence, the primary analysis was an analysis of covariance on post-test achievement with the pre-test as covariate, with familywise error controlled across both confirmatory outcomes. Engagement was higher in the experimental class by 10.92 points, 95% CI [7.90, 13.94], t(56) = 7.25, Hedges' g = 1.88. Adjusted post-test achievement was higher by 13.16 points, 95% CI [9.66, 16.67], F(1, 55) = 56.73, partial η² = .51, and remained stable across separate-slopes, Welch, and rank-based analyses. Engagement and achievement were strongly associated, r = .74, 95% CI [.60, .84], though this fell to .43 and .62 within classes. An exploratory decomposition attributed roughly half the adjusted group difference to engagement; because engagement was measured once, concurrently with the post-test, this is a statistical partition rather than a causal mechanism. Findings from a single school require replication.

References

Akmal, Ambiyar, Usmeldi, & Fadillah, R. (2025). Developing and Assessing the Impact of an Integrated STEM ‎Project-Based Learning Model in Vocational Education for Enhanced Competence and Employability. ‎Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 5. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251786‎

Bullock-Yowell, Emily., & Reardon, R. C. . (2024). Holland’s RIASEC hexagon : a paradigm for life and work ‎decisions. Florida State Open Publishing.‎

Chan, C.-C. (2018). Factors Affecting Career Goals of Taiwanese College Athletes From Perspective of Social ‎Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Career Development, 47(2), 193–206. ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318793234‎

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler‐Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of Hands-on STEM Engagement Activities With ‎Positive STEM Dispositions in Secondary School Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, ‎‎24(6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6‎

Chukwuedo, S. O., Onwusuru, I. M., & Agbo, N. M. (2022). Practitioners’ vocational guidance with direct learning ‎model: influencing career commitment and employability in electrical/electronic technology education. ‎International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 22(1), 23–48.‎

Creswell, J. W. , & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ‎approaches. . Sage Publications.‎

Demszky, D., Liu, J., Hill, H. C., & Jurafsky, D. (2023). Automated feedback improves teachers’ uptake of student ‎ideas in classroom discourse. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 45(3), 421–448. ‎https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737231169270‎

Dewi, I. P., Asnur, L., Marta, R., Yanto, D. T. P., Dhanil, M., Saari, E. M., & Ali, S. K. (2025). How Effective Is ‎Immersive AR Continental Food Course for Vocational Education? Analyzing Knowledge Gains and ‎Learning Outcome Effects. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 127–‎‎136. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2225‎

Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., Kosty, D., Turtura, J. E., Sutherland, M., Maddox, S. A., & Smolkowski, K. (2021). Using ‎direct observation to document “practice-based evidence” of evidence-based mathematics instruction. ‎Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(1), 20–35.‎

Entwistle, J., Smith, R., & Moore, T. (2025). Cognitive coaching and teacher efficacy: Evidence from school-based ‎mentoring. Professional Development in Education, 51(2), 233–248. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2025.2570687‎

Feng, J., & Hou, H. (2023). STEM in Vocational Education and Training: The Future Direction. Stem Education ‎Review, 1. https://doi.org/10.54844/stemer.2023.0431‎

Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2022). Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. ‎Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155–183.‎

Guo, J., Zhou, Q., Xiong, S., Liu, H., Xia, S., & Su, R. (2023). Electric Power Training Simulation Platform Based on ‎Virtual Reality Technology. 27. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2691838‎

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. R. (2016). Building Up STEM: An Analysis of Teacher-Developed ‎Engineering Design-Based STEM Integration Curricular Materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering ‎Education Research (J-Peer), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129‎

Imaran, M., Salisu, I., Aslam, H. D., Iqbal, J., & Irfan Hameed. (2019). Sustainability in the Era of IR 4 . 0 : The ‎Mediating and. Processes, 7, 1–25.‎

Irfan, D., Mursyida, L., & Mubai, A. (2023). Implementation of mobile learning design in the flipped direct ‎instruction model to increase student competency using a constructivist approach. Journal of Education ‎Technology, 7(4), 752–762.‎

Irfan, D., Watrianthos, R., & Nur Bin Yunus, F. A. (2025). AI in Education: A Decade of Global Research Trends ‎and Future Directions. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 17(2), 135–‎‎153. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2025.02.07‎

Khan, D., Plopski, A., Fujimoto, Y., Kanbara, M., Jabeen, G., Zhang, Y. J., Zhang, X., & Kato, H. (2022). Surface ‎Remeshing: A Systematic Literature Review of Methods and Research Directions. In IEEE Transactions ‎on Visualization and Computer Graphics (Vol. 28, Number 3, pp. 1680–1713). IEEE Computer Society. ‎https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3016645‎

Kholifah, N., Kurdi, M. S., Nurtanto, M., Mutohhari, F., Fawaid, M., & Subramaniam, T. S. (2023). The role of ‎teacher self-efficacy on the instructional quality in 21st century: A study on vocational teachers, ‎Indonesia. Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN, 2252(8822), 8822.‎

Krishnawati, N., Nurihsan, J., Budimansyah, D., & Nurdin, E. S. (2023). The Role of Entrepreneurship Education ‎in Shaping Students’ Emotional and Cognitive Competencies for Entrepreneurship. International Journal ‎of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2), 262–280. ‎https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.15‎

Labak, S., Hursen, C., & Ozcinar, Z. (2025). Online video-based professional development for teachers: Effects on ‎teaching practices and student learning. Education Sciences, 16(1), 36. ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010036‎

Lee, H., Cheng, Y., Wang, W., Lin, C., & Huang, Y. (2023). Exploring the Learning Process and Effectiveness of ‎STEM Education via Learning Behavior Analysis and the Interactive-Constructive- Active-Passive ‎Framework. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 951–976. ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221136888‎

Lutz, S., Ebenbeck, N., & Gebhardt, M. (2023). Mathematical Skills of Students with Special Educational Needs in ‎the Area of Learning (SEN-L) in Pre-Vocational Programs in Germany. International Journal for Research ‎in Vocational Education and Training, 10(1), 1–23.‎

Mayes, R. L., & Rittschof, K. A. (2021). Development of Interdisciplinary STEM Impact Measures of Student ‎Attitudes and Reasoning. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631684‎

McLeod, S. (2018). Jean Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development.‎

Mubai, A., Ambiyar, Irfan, D., & Rasul, M. S. (2023). Flipped Direct Instruction (FDI): A New Practicum Learning ‎Model in Vocational Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, ‎‎22(7), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.29‎

Muskhir, M., Luthfi, A., Sidiq, H., & Fadillah, R. (2024). Development of Augmented Reality Based Interactive ‎Learning Media on Electric Motor Installation Subjects. International Journal on Informatics ‎Visualization, 8(4), 2097–2103. www.joiv.org/index.php/joiv‎

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., & Delaney, O. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. ‎Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713‎

Nouwen, W., Clycq, N., Struyf, A., & Donche, V. (2022). The role of work-based learning for student engagement ‎in vocational education and training: an application of the self-system model of motivational ‎development: W. Nouwen et al. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(3), 877–900.‎

Pardimin, P., ARCANA, N., & Supriadi, D. (2019). Developing Media Based on the Information and ‎Communications Technology to Improve the Effectiveness of the Direct Instruction Method in ‎Mathematics Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1311–1323. ‎https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.592636‎

Powell, S. R., Mason, E. N., Bos, S. E., Hirt, S., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Lembke, E. S. (2021). A systematic review ‎of mathematics interventions for middle–school students experiencing mathematics difficulty. Learning ‎Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 295–329.‎

Rahmah, A., Djamaan, E. Z., Fauzan, A., & Harisman, Y. (2025). Development of Video-Assisted Mathematics ‎Learning Materials Using the SAVI Model to Enhance Mathematical Representation Skills. Jurnal Edutech ‎Undiksha, 13(1), 167–178.‎

Rahmiati, R., Jalinus, N., Effendi, H., Fadillah, R., & Wulansari, R. E. (2024). Assessing the Impact of a STEM ‎Learning Project Model on Artificial Intelligence Education in Higher Learning Institutions. Data and ‎Metadata, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.623‎

Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., & Lekwa, A. J. (2021). Coaching teachers for classroom behavior management: A ‎randomized controlled trial. Journal of School Psychology, 87, 98–112. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.04.001‎

Rohanai, R., Othman, H., Daud, K. A. M., Omar, N. H., Ahmad, M., Ismail, M. E., & Sulaiman, A. (2019). Concept of ‎Correlation Between Active Learning and Employability Skills in TVET. Online Journal for Tvet ‎Practitioners, 04(02). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.05.01.003‎

Romero, I., & García, M. del M. (2023). Mathematical Attitudes Transformation When Introducing GeoGebra in ‎the Secondary Classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 10277–10302. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12085-w

Santiago, L. M., & Nabayra, J. N. (2024). Video Assisted Learning Module (VALM) for the Least Learned ‎Competencies in General Mathematics. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 482–‎‎510.‎

Satnarine, T. (2023). Systematic review methodology: Conducting high-quality reviews and understanding their ‎significance in evidence-based practice. Journal for International Medical Graduates, 2.‎

Sezgin, S., & Yüzer, T. V. (2022). Analysing adaptive gamification design principles for online courses. Behaviour ‎& Information Technology, 41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1817559‎

Shelle, G., Earnesty, D., Pilkenton, A., & Powell, E. (2018). Adaptive learning: An innovative method for online ‎teaching and learning. The Journal of Extension. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.56.05.17‎

Statti, A. (2020). Learner-Active, Technology-Infused Classroom. 38–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-‎‎9304-1.ch003‎

Struyf, A., Loof, H. De, Pauw, J. B., & Petegem, P. Van. (2019). Students’ Engagement in Different STEM Learning ‎Environments: Integrated STEM Education as Promising Practice? International Journal of Science ‎Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983‎

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.‎

Suharno, S., Pambudi, N., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational Education in Indonesia: History, Development, ‎Opportunities, and Challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105092. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105092‎

Surur, A. M. S., Akhyar, M. K., Ridwanulloh, M. U., Mohamed, H. B., & Günerhan, H. (2023). Application of video-‎assisted online interactive learning to improve student mathematics learning outcomes. Jurnal ‎Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika (JPPM), 5(2), 130–144.‎

Wannapiroon, P., Nilsook, P., Techakosit, S., & Kamkhuntod, S. (2021). STEM Literacy of Students in Vocational ‎Education. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(4), 527–549. ‎https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.253‎

Widana, I. W., Sopandi, A. T., & Suwardika, G. (2021). Development of an Authentic Assessment Model in ‎Mathematics Learning: A Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. ‎Indonesian Research Journal in Education |Irje|, 5(1), 192–209. ‎https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.12992‎

Zhou, X., Teng, D., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2024). The mediating role of generative AI self-regulation on students’ ‎critical thinking and problem-solving. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1302.‎

Zhu, Y., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Impacts of classroom teaching practices on students’ mathematics learning interest, ‎mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics test achievements: a secondary analysis of Shanghai data ‎from the international video study Global Teaching InSights. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(3), 581–‎‎593.‎

‎ ‎

Published
2026-08-19
How to Cite
Yulia Cresna, Abna Hidayati, Fetri Yeni J., & Hani Fannisa. (2026). Seeing the solution: video-assisted direct instruction, learning ‎engagement, and mathematics achievement in vocational ‎education. JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia, 6(2), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.62159/jpi.v6i2.2543
Section
Articles