Directive Speech Acts Drive Higher Engagement: A Pragmatic ‎Linguistic Study of Patisserie Brand Captions

  • Jerry Wilson Politeknik Pariwisata Medan, Indonesia
  • Mukhlis Lubis STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
Keywords: Consumer Engagement, Digital Discourse, Pragmatic Linguistics, Patisserie Marketing, Speech Arts

Abstract

This study examines how three types of pragmatic speech acts directive, expressive, and informative are employed in social media captions by international patisserie brands and how these linguistic strategies relate to consumer engagement. Addressing the limited scholarly attention to speech act functions in commercial digital discourse, this research applies Speech Act Theory and a descriptive quantitative approach to analyze 12 purposively selected captions from Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok. The findings indicate that informative speech acts are the most frequently used, while directive speech acts appear to be associated with relatively higher levels of engagement, particularly within TikTok comment interactions. However, this pattern should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. These results highlight the potential persuasive role of directive forms in digital marketing communication. Despite limitations related to sample size and language scope, the study offers theoretical insights into pragmatic patterning in brand discourse and provides practical implications for optimizing engagement-driven content. Future research should expand the dataset and incorporate multimodal as well as cross-linguistic perspectives to deepen the understanding of speech act functions in digital marketing contexts.

References

Chen, B., Lukito, J., & Koo, G. H. (2023). Comparing the #StopTheSteal movement across multiple platforms: ‎Differentiating discourse on Facebook, Twitter, and Parler. Social Media + Society, 9(3). ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196879‎

Dang, C. N., & Han, L. T. (2026). Classifying speech acts in English–Vietnamese proverbs: A cognitive–‎pragmatic approach. Ampersand, 16, Article 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2026.100264‎

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Wang, Y., Alalwan, A. A., Ahn, S. J., Balakrishnan, J., Barta, S., Belk, R., Buhalis, D., ‎Dutot, V., Felix, R., Filieri, R., Flavián, C., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Hollensen, S., Jain, V., Kim, J., ‎Krishen, A. S., … Wirtz, J. (2023). Metaverse marketing: How the metaverse will shape the future of ‎consumer research and practice. Psychology & Marketing, 40(4), 750–776. ‎https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21767‎

Fähnrich, B., Weitkamp, E., & Kupper, J. F. (2023). Exploring ‘quality’ in science communication online: ‎Expert thoughts on how to assess and promote science communication quality in digital media ‎contexts. Public Understanding of Science, 32(5), 605–621. ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221148054‎

Gautam, N., Verma, M., & Ray, B. (2024). Satisfaction unveiled: Decoding the antecedents and consequences ‎of halal tourism—A meta-analytical approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(10), 2549–2572. ‎https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2023-0194‎

Guillén-Nieto, V. (2023). Hate speech: Linguistic perspectives. De Gruyter. ‎https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110672619‎

Hermajiwandini, C. M. D. W., Ngarbingan, H. K., Ulfah, I. F., Prasetiyo, Y., & Wijaya, R. A. T. (2025). Tourism ‎technology with ergo-iconic value innovation for sutainable economic development. Journal of ‎Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(4s), 251–259. ‎https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i4s.496‎

House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2025). Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. ‎Language Teaching, 58(3), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000477‎

Lim, R. E., & Lee, S. Y. (2023). “You are a virtual influencer!”: Understanding the impact of origin disclosure ‎and emotional narratives on parasocial relationships and virtual influencer credibility. Computers in ‎Human Behavior, 148, Article 107897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107897‎

Linhares, D. (2025). Directives and intentions. Natural Language Semantics, 33(2), 255–289. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-025-09232-z

Liu, L., Fang, J., Yang, L., Han, L., Hossin, M. A., & Wen, C. (2023). The power of talk: Exploring the effects of ‎streamers’ linguistic styles on sales performance in B2B livestreaming commerce. Information ‎Processing & Management, 60(3), Article 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103259‎

Munaro, A. C., Barcelos, R. H., Francisco-Maffezzolli, E. C., Santos Rodrigues, J. P. S., & Cabrera Paraiso, E. C. ‎‎(2024). Does your style engage? Linguistic styles of influencers and digital consumer engagement on ‎YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, Article 108217. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108217‎

Murray, S. E., & Starr, W. B. (2021). The structure of communicative acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 44(2), ‎‎425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09289-0‎

Razzaq, A., Shao, W., & Thaichon, S. Q. (2023). Towards an understanding of meme marketing: ‎Conceptualisation and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing Management, 39(7–8), 670–701. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2158906‎

Ricca, M. (2022). The ‘spaghettification’ of performativity across cultural boundaries: The trans-‎culturality/trans-spatiality of digital communication as an event horizon for speech acts. ‎International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 35(6), ‎‎2435–2479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09880-4‎

Sbisà, M. (2023). Essays on speech acts and other topics in pragmatics. Oxford University Press. ‎https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844125.001.0001‎

Shakki, F., Naeini, J., Mazandarani, O., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Instructed second language pragmatics for ‎the speech act of apology in an Iranian EFL context: A meta-analysis. Applied Research on English ‎Language, 10(3), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2021.128213.1709‎

Singh, A., Dey, S., Singha, A., & Saha, S. (2022). Sentiment and emotion-aware multi-modal complaint ‎identification. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(11), 12163–12171. ‎https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21476‎

Solnyshkina, M., McNamara, D., & Zamaletdinov, R. (2022). Natural language processing and discourse ‎complexity studies. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 26(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-‎‎0088-30171‎

Tajeddin, Z., & Malmir, A. (2024). Pragmatic motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of L2 ‎pragmatic knowledge. TESOL Journal, 15(4), Article e876. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.876‎

Yang, J., Xiu, P., Sun, L., Ying, L., & Muthu, B. (2022). Social media data analytics for business decision making ‎system to competitive analysis. Information Processing & Management, 59(1), Article 102751. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102751‎

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Wilson, J., & Lubis, M. (2026). Directive Speech Acts Drive Higher Engagement: A Pragmatic ‎Linguistic Study of Patisserie Brand Captions. JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia, 6(1), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.62159/jpi.v6i1.1962