Indonesian EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Pedagogical Tasks Designed Based on Task Complexity

Mahpul; Khairun Nisa; Aksendro Maximilian

doi:10.62159/ghaitsa.v7i2.2463

Mahpul University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Khairun Nisa University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Aksendro Maximilian University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v7i2.2463

Keywords: The Triadic Componential Framework, Learners’ perceptions, Cognitive factors, Learner factors

Abstract

With reference to the Triadic Componential Framework, there are three aspects of designing pedagogical tasks to take into consideration, i.e., cognitive factors (task complexity), interactive factors (task condition), and learner factors (task difficulty). So far, numerous task-based studies have been concerned with investigation of the effect of tasks sequenced on the basis of cognitive factors. This is due to the fact that cognitive factors can be easily predicted from the beginning. Few studies have explored learner factors regarding levels of difficulty, stress, self-confidence, interest, and motivation contributing to language performance when learners work on the tasks manipulated along with the cognitive factors. The current study aimed to explore i) the Indonesian EFL learners’ perceptions of the three types of tasks developed on the basis of cognitive factors, and ii) the factors contributing to learners’ factors when performing the tasks. The subjects of the current study were 30 students of the English Department, the University of Lampung, Indonesia. Three types of tasks and questionnairs were used as the instruments to collect the data of learners’ affective factors. The findings of the current study showed that learner factors do not necessarily correspond to the manipulation of task complexity. This suggests that factors other than cognitive factors are necessarily taken into account of designing pedagogical tasks from the beginning as they contribute to learners’ performance of working on tasks.

References

Allaw, E., & McDonough, K. (2019). The effect of task sequencing on second language written lexical complexity, accuracy, and fluency. System 85 pp. 1-12.
Astuti, W.Z., Mahpul, & Kadaryanto, B. (2025). The effect of task complexity on spoken language production by Indonesian EFL learners. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan. Vol.14, No.1, pp. 1-15.
Awwad, A. (2019). L2 learners’ and professionals perceptions of cognitive task complexity: Towards developing an Index of task difficulty. The Journal ofAsia TEFL. Vol.16, No.2, pp.468-484.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamilah, Rianawati, & Mahpul. (2025). Gender -based topic preferences in writing among Indonesian junior high school students. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan. Vol.14, No.1, pp. 1-7.
Kim.Y. (2009).The effect of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37:2, pp. 254-268.
Mahpul. (2014). Task Complexity in Dialogic Oral Production by Indonesian EFL Learners. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Curtin University of Technology, Perth.
Mahpul & Oliver, R. (2018). The effect of task complexity in dialogic oral production by
Indonesian EFL Learners.The Asian EFL Journal. Vol. 20:.6, pp. 20-35.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Optaria, T., Mahpul, & Sukirlan, M. The use of task complexity in written language production. TELL-US Journal. Vol. 11 No.2, pp. 601-613.
Qiu, X. (2020). Functions of oral monologic tasks: Effects of topic familiarity on L2 speaking performance. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 24 (6), pp. 745-764.
Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22:1, pp. 27-57.
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognitive hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning.Second Language Studies, 21:2, pp. 45-105.
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: studies in a componential framework for second language task design. Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, pp. 1-32.
Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In Garcia Mayo, M.P. (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language teaching: SLA (pp.7-27). Multilingual Matters.
Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: a review of issues. Language Learning.Supplement, 1, pp. 1-36.
Robinson, P. (2015). Second language task demands, the Cognition Hypothesis, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygates (Ed). Domains and Directions in the Developmenet of TBLT (pp.123-159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robinson, P. (2022). The Cognition Hypothesis, the Triadic Componential Framework, and theSSARC Model: An Introdutional DesignTheory of Pedagogical Task Sequencing. In M.
Ahmadian & M.H. Long (Eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, pp. 205-225. NewYork: Cambridge Unoiversity Press.
Saldana, J., (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
Samuda,V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave, London: Macmillan.
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction.Language Teaching, 36, pp. 1-14.
Tavakoli, P. (2009). Investigating task difficulty: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19:1, pp. 1-25.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education.From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris. J. M. (2009). Tasked-based language teaching: introducing the reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.