Exploring Students' Responses to Constructivist Learning Elements Across Learning Styles and Topic Preferences

  • Habi Septiawan Doctoral Program of Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Ag. Bambang Setiyadi Doctoral Program of Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Sukirlan Doctoral Program of Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Khairun Nisa English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Keywords: Constructivist Learning, Learning Styles, Topic Preferences, Student Ownership, Multiple Perspectives, EFL

Abstract

This study explores students’ responses to constructivist learning elements across different learning styles and topic preferences in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. Specifically, it examines how students with different learning styles and preferred topics perceive five constructivist learning elements: Complex Learning Environment/Authentic Task, Social Negotiation, Multiple Perspectives, Knowledge Construction, and Student Ownership. Thirty-five students participated in the study and were grouped into eight categories based on the combination of three learning styles (auditory, visual, and kinesthetic) and three topic preferences (Entertainment & Pop Culture, Experience & Story, and Personal & Daily Life). Data were collected through a questionnaire adapted from constructivist learning theory and analyzed descriptively using mean scores. The findings revealed variations in students’ responses across learning styles and topic preferences. The Kinesthetic–Entertainment & Pop Culture group demonstrated the highest overall mean score (M = 3.65), while the Auditory–Personal & Daily Life group obtained the lowest (M = 2.73). Across all groups, Complex Learning Environment/Authentic Task consistently received the lowest ratings, indicating that students were less positive toward complex and authentic learning tasks than other constructivist elements. In contrast, Student Ownership emerged as the highest-rated element in most groups. Additionally, students who shared the Entertainment & Pop Culture preference, regardless of learning style, reported the highest scores on Multiple Perspectives. These findings suggest that topic preferences may play an important role in shaping specific constructivist learning experiences, while learning styles influence the overall level of student responses.

References

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
Faridi, M., & Izadpanah, S. (2024). The study of EFL learners’ perception of using e-learning, self-regulation and constructivism in English classrooms: Teachers’, intermediate and advanced learners’ attitudes. Journal of Language and Education, 10(2), 45–58.
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hancock, J., Al Bishawi, R., & Coyle, D. (2023). Ownership and agency through learner-led design of shared learning spaces: A multi-case study approach. Cambridge Journal of Education, 53(6), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2023.2234848
Li, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2024). I do and I understand: A virtual reality-supported collaborative design-assessing activity for EFL students. System, 121, 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103213
Lysne, D. A., De Caro-Barek, V., Støckert, R., et al. (2023). Students’ motivation and ownership in a cross-campus and online setting. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1062767. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1062767
Pan, Y., Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Strategic questioning for formative assessment in TEFL: Insights from blended synchronous learning environments. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1519. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04086-y
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Precelas, R. A., & Napil, J. B. (2024). Constructivist learning environments and student engagement in English language classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 21, 45–60.
Taggart, J., & Wheeler, L. B. (2023). Collaborative learning as constructivist practice: An exploratory qualitative descriptive study of faculty approaches to student group work. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231193938
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology (13th ed.). Pearson.
Published
2026-06-20
How to Cite
Septiawan, H., Setiyadi, A. B., Sukirlan, M., & Nisa, K. (2026). Exploring Students’ Responses to Constructivist Learning Elements Across Learning Styles and Topic Preferences. GHAITSA : Islamic Education Journal , 7(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v7i2.2458
Section
Articles