Self-Efficacy as a Psychological Mechanism in Sufi Healing: A Qualitative Study in an Islamic Boarding School
Abstract
Spiritual healing has increasingly been recognized as a meaningful resource in mental health recovery; however, the psychological mechanisms through which spiritual practices facilitate recovery remain insufficiently examined, particularly within Islamic healing traditions. Drawing on Bandura’s social cognitive theory, this study investigates self-efficacy as a central psychological mechanism in Sufi healing and explores how structured spiritual practices contribute to strengthening individuals’ perceived capacity to cope with psychological distress. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, this study was conducted at an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia that integrates Sufi-based spiritual healing practices. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with ten participants, including spiritual leaders, mentors, and individuals undergoing spiritual healing, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Four interrelated themes emerged: restored confidence, spiritual empowerment, psychological strengthening, and renewed sense of agency. Participants described increased emotional stability, enhanced confidence, and greater perceived control over their lives following engagement in spiritual practices such as dhikr, prayer, and guided mentorship. The findings suggest that Sufi healing facilitates psychological recovery not solely through spiritual experience but through strengthening self-efficacy beliefs that support adaptive coping and resilience. This study advances the field of spirituality and mental health by empirically positioning self-efficacy as a mediating psychological mechanism linking spiritual practice and psychological recovery within a non-Western Islamic context.
References
Abu-Raiya, H., & Pargament, K. I. (2011). Empirically based psychology of Islam: Summary and critique of the literature. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670903426482
Ai, A. L., Peterson, C., & Huang, B. (2005). The effect of religious-spiritual coping on positive attitudes of adult Muslim refugees. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1503_2
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Benight, C. C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1129-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
George, L. K., Ellison, C. G., & Larson, D. B. (2002). Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health. Psychological Inquiry, 13(3), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_04
Haque, A. (2004). Psychology from Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. Journal of Religion and Health, 43(4), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-004-4302-3
Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 278730. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Levin, J. (2010). Religion and mental health: Theory and research. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 7(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.240
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Maddux, J. E. (2009). Self-efficacy: The power of believing you can. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 335-343). Oxford University Press.
Park, C. L. (2005). Religion and meaning. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 295-314). Guilford Press.
Pargament, K. I. (2011). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Rothman, A., & Coyle, A. (2018). Toward a framework for Islamic psychology and psychotherapy: An Islamic model of the soul. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(5), 1731-1744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0651-x
Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout. Applied Psychology, 57(s1), 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x
Smith, T. B., McCullough, M. E., & Poll, J. (2003). Religiousness and depression: Evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 614-636. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.614
Copyright (c) 2026 Zaen Musyrifin, Aziz Muslim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
DAWUH: Islamic Communication Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the DAWUH: Islamic Communication Journal Natural Science is the first publisher, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.









